![]() The score are not irrational at all, is very well explained in this post from a user who do use C4D since many years, just like me(and unlike many people who have never used C4D but feels free to write about the software) : So, could you please supply any relevant OGL scores, perhaps for a 12x2.93 Mac Pro? Which card scores the best in Cinebench R15 OGL for my Mac Pro 5.1?Įdit: the 7950 gets 68 fps - but to my mind thats not worth the pricey change of the card.Ĭlick to expand.Sorry but this is totally wrong.Ĭ4D do use the latest OpenGL version, you are probably just looking at minimum requirement.Ĭinebench(like C4D) do use hardware OpenGL, software shading is also available just in case your GPU do not work correctly but you have to set this in the preference panel(of course you get slower viewport performance). But I did not get any useful answer, instead my wallet standing by. Via ebay I asked Macvidcards (for 780/ 680) and Create_Pro (for Titan Black) for the Cinebench scores of the cards. I contacted Rob from bare feats, he supplied me with the score of the GTX 680 (weak 53 fps). But I don't get any reliable results on which graphics-card (Mac- or flashed/ unflashed PC-cards) get the most high OpenGL-score under Cinebench R15. ![]() The EVGA GTX 680 Mac, the Sapphire 7950 and especially all the overpriced Quadros simply do not get a score higher than my aging ATI 5870 - 62 fps. But I have to rely on it since I am working daily with Cinema4D. My current ATI 5870 scores 62 fps and I didn't find any card with a higher OGL-score for my MP 5.1/ OS X. The reason is that Cinebench R20 don't perform the GPU test.I want to improve my main MacPro 5.1 (12x2.93 GHz, 24 GB RAM, 10.9.4, ATI Radeon 5870, OWC Mercury Accelsior PCIe SSD) with a stronger graphics-card in terms of a higher Cinebench R15 OpenGL score. Here, you won't find any GPU score in product review written August 2020 onward. That's why I don't compare the results between R20 and R15. And, it require 8 times more computational power to render the test in addition to 4 times more memory. However, Maxon has still put a manual that give you an information on how to save the test report, share it, some command line operations, and other file menu options.Īccording to Maxon, R20 version of Cinebench uses much larger and complex test scene than R15. Cinebench is so easy to understand and operate that I didn't require to read the manual even if there is a change in version. I have used the Cinebench tool to review all the laptop that I got for review. Why Cinebench R20?įirst, I will tell you why I always uses Cinebench to show you CPU core's performance. The higher the score, the better the performance. Cinebench runs several complex tests, put stress on the processor, and calculate the score for single and multi-core performance. It gives the performance data of hardware that you're using, in the form of score. What's the Cinebench?Ĭinebench is a tool developed by Maxon to measure the real time capabilities of the hardware that you are or may going to buy. R20 and R15 are nothing but the different version of the same software. In some articles, I have written "Cinebench R20 score". If you read any of my review articles related to laptops, you will I have used the word "Cinebench score".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |